• Urbanize
  • Posts
  • Urban Planners Face High Stakes As AI Tools Enter The Field

Urban Planners Face High Stakes As AI Tools Enter The Field

AI is transforming urban planning, but without strong safeguards, we risk repeating historic inequities and eroding public trust.

Your City. Your Market. Your Next Deal.

Stay up to date on national urban real estate

📅 Today's Story: As AI becomes more and more commonplace in planning departments, urban planner Tom Sanchez argues the stakes are rising fast—and so is the need to embed ethics and public accountability into how we deploy new tech.

PLANNING


Urban Planners Face High Stakes As AI Tools Enter The Field

A rendering of Toronto’s Quayside smart city (Sidewalk Labs)

📰 What Happened: Modern AI tools enable both amateur and professional planners to analyze mobility data, identify patterns, and visualize faster than ever, revolutionizing urban planning. But the rapid rise of generative AI (genAI) also raises concerns around privacy, bias, and transparency.

🔍 A Closer Look: GenAI systems can perpetuate systemic inequities if they rely on biased or incomplete data. Accountability (and accuracy) can also be murky when vendors build tools without a background in urban planning. Historical examples—like Toronto’s failed Sidewalk Labs project—highlight how easily trust can be lost.

🧠 Why It Matters: Some forward-thinking cities are responding by establishing ethics committees and requiring independent oversight from the outset. If AI is to serve as a tool for inclusive, equitable decision-making, planners must ensure that community input is foundational—not an afterthought.

Planetizen (Tom Sanchez)

 

Atlanta

Chicago

Los Angeles